top of page

What’s wrong with “the right to defend ourselves”? Quite a lot, actually.

Egypt floods the Gaza tunnels, crippling Hamas for 55 days; Israel agrees ceasefires, broken within the hour.

Member of Knesset Gilad Erdan famously refused to kowtow to President Barack Obama. He was clear that Israel was not the fifty-first state of the United States. The country existed in its own right and there was no need to spell that out. That was then.

In what Israel National News describes as “a sharply worded letter” to the United Nations Security Council on 9 May 2023, Ambassador Erdan asserts Israel’s right to defend itself. We must ask, what does it mean to exist, if you do not have the right to defend that existence? Indeed, it is possible to argue that the right to defend oneself is a prerequisite for existence; otherwise the existence is a sham, forfeit before it is even established.

To assert that Israel has the right to defend itself is to assert that Israel has the right to exist; to assert that Israel has the right to exist is to show that, in your own mind, that existence is in question. Therefore, to assert that Israel has the right to defend itself is to project Israel’s questionable existence from your own mind into the minds of others. Every country simply defends itself, without feeling the need to assert any right to do so, except Israel. This amounts to Israel apologising not only for defending itself, but for existing. It is another way of allowing ownership of your half of the cloth to be disputed.

Ambassador Erdan’s letter opens with a justification before a body not remotely interested in the right or wrong of Israel’s actions or positions. What the Ambassador read was not necessarily what his audience heard. An enemy of Israel determined to see her destroyed might hear Erdan’s words differently (all emphases are mine):

Last night, in response to the barrage of over 100 rocket attacks launched last week (May 2-3) against the civilian population in southern Israel as well as numerous terror attacks carried out against civilians,

Look at how bad these terrorists are.

the IDF launched Operation ‘Shield and Arrow,’

We had no alternative but to act.

a targeted operation against senior members of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) terrorist organization in the Gaza Strip. …Israel acted in a precise and limited manner against senior military officials in the PIJ who were directly responsible for facilitating attacks and launching rockets and missiles against Israelis,

But we took extra special care to neutralise only the really, really, really bad people.

in order to protect Israel’s citizens and thwart the planned attacks.

We had a legitimate reason.

[Islamic Jihad] uses the citizens of the Gaza Strip as human shields - they hide their rockets among the civilian population, use private houses as situation rooms and fire from dense urban areas.

Please understand the wider context. This handful of extremists put their own innocent civilians in danger.

It is a designated terrorist organisation by Australia, Canada, the EU, Japan, New Zealand, the U.K., U.S., and Israel.

Don’t just take our word for it. They really are bad. We’re not alone in saying this. Other big names say so, too.

The operation was a targeted action against an active terrorist infrastructure,

Did I mention how careful we were and how bad they are?

which posed an imminent threat.

They fired 100 rockets, destroyed private dwellings and forced us to evacuate several cities, and all we did was a targeted action against an active terrorist infrastructure, nothing more, honestly.

The State of Israel is not interested in an escalation.

Don’t worry. This does not mean we intend to solve the problem. In fact, we give you our categorical assurance that we will maintain the status quo.

However, Israel has the right and duty to defend its people and sovereignty and will continue to do so vigorously.

However, we really are a state.

I call on the Security Council to condemn the indiscriminate rocket attacks on Israeli civilians launched from Gaza, and to support Israel in our legitimate right of self-defence.

Please help us out here. Our people are innocent. Our right to self-defence is legitimate.

And so, just when we thought it could not get any worse, the Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations weakens his country’s self-inflicted already weakened position (asserting the right to self-defence), still further by asserting the legitimacy of its right to self-defence, thereby himself drawing even his own asserted right to self-defence into question.

The assertion that Ambassador Erdan’s letter should have made is that no one has the right to attack Israel. The assertion it makes instead is that Israel is less of a state than all other states. The country that falls back from the right to not be attacked onto the right to defend itself, ipso facto asserts the right of others to attack her. By asserting the right to defend herself, Israel gives up the sanctity of her existence, and then, having abandoned that sanctity, claims entitlement to it.

The Ambassador’s letter divides Israel’s own cloth, its existence, in half and offers up one half, the right of self-defence, for dispute. Just how slippery this slope is once you get on it, the letter itself demonstrates. Eldan takes even this disputed half, the right of self-defence, and cuts that, too, in half, by drawing the legitimacy of the very self-defence he has just fallen back onto into question. His letter aids not only those who deny Israel’s existence, but also those who deny her right to defend herself.

This is precisely the parlous condition Israel has come to: the world now rebukes Israel for interfering in the jihad against Israel and the Jews, exactly as Muslims have the right to kill the beaten dhimmi who dares to defend himself for interfering with the Muslim’s right to beat or otherwise abuse him. According to one historic account (amongst many):

The Jews are fond of frequenting the tombs of their forefathers, especially on particular days, to read their prayers in remembrance of the dead. Here advantage is taken of them again. They are rudely accosted and pilfered, and if resistance is made, they are beat almost to death, and this not by common highwaymen or Bedouin Arabs, but by men they may have been in the habit of seeing and talking with every day.

Once the right to not be attacked is asserted, the existence of even one rocket in Gaza, fired or not, fielded or not, assembled or not, is ample reason to destroy it and everyone and everything associated with it. It is beyond question that that rocket exists for one purpose only, made explicit by its owners at every possible opportunity. It is how they maintain credibility with the “innocent civilians” who dance in the streets every time the “handful of extremists” murders a Jew.

More importantly, Israel acquiescing in the existence of rockets and people who will fire them in Gaza (and now also in Judea and Samaria*), that is to say, not attacking them until after they have fired the rockets, is to acknowledge the right of those enemies to attack Israel. And since attacking Israel is a right that Palestinians explicitly claim, Israel, by allowing Palestinians, or anyone who claims that right, to develop the means of attack, to them signals respect for their right to attack Israel. This, again, is the condition of the dhimmi, who must at all times respect the Muslim’s right to attack and abuse him.

Gilad Erdan’s letter, written not in ink, but in weakness, is demeaning of both Israel and of the proud Jewish nation. At its centre is pathos, pre-emptive submission, the same pre-emptive submission that characterises many Jewish leaders and spokespersons, in particular in the United States. On one of the umpteenth occasions when Israel allowed herself to be beaten back from integrating Judea and Samaria properly into the rest of Israel, as she has been entitled to do since the Mandate for Palestine, American intellectual Daniel Pipes, in classic pre-emptive submission, advised:

Don’t toy with Mr. Trump’s temper, don’t infuriate Democrats and Europeans, don’t alienate Arab leaders, don’t inflame Palestinians, don’t radicalize the Israeli Left, and don’t add Palestinian citizens to Israel. …[don’t] further [worsen the] alienation of diaspora Jewry and increase their exposure to antisemitism.

In short, be a Jew with trembling knees. Be afraid of Mr Trump. Be afraid of the Democrats and Europeans. Be afraid of Arab leaders. Be afraid of the Palestinians. Be afraid of the Israeli Left. Give way to diaspora Jewry. As the feudal peasant adopts the interests of his master, so must the Jew adopt the interests of his oppressor. This is Pipes’s advice, and Ambassador Erdan’s letter continues this centuries-long tradition of self-humiliation, briefly interrupted by Menachem Begin, whose words grow more apposite by the day:

I was tasked by the nation to ensure our safety. It is my sacred obligation. And he [German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt] gives me advice — to the whole Europe, and the whole world, how to convince us to accept a Palestinian state? Is this not a hostile act of the highest possible extent? And from where does he come? From the nation who’s responsible for the Holocaust that killed six million of us, a third of our nation. …He gives us advice on how to ensure our security?

…Forgive me, ladies and gentlemen. I came from the underground fighters. I’m not afraid of anyone. I tell him the truth to his face. I don’t have any reason to be afraid. …So after all this he tells us, “establish a Palestinian state”? Meaning, put the three-and-a-half million Jews living in Israel in threat of annihilation? And I’m not supposed to answer him?

So I answered him—properly, my friends. I don’t regret even one word I said. And if there’s some softhearted people who’ll start twisting their noses, let them have twisted noses.

Yet Israel’s leaders continue to be surprised that their enemies keep treating the Jewish state as if it doesn’t exist. Type “Israel” into the search box at Security Council Report, “Independent. Impartial. Informative,” and it offers: “Golan (Israel/Syria)”; “Middle East (Israel/Palestine)”; “Israel/Palestine”; “Middle East, including the Palestinian Question”, and so on and on, except for expressions like “Israeli Settlements,” when an adjectival existence can grudgingly be conceded. This reminds one of motorway signs in the former German Democratic Republic showing the way to “Berlin, Hauptstadt der DDR” so as to avoid saying “Ost-Berlin,” an implicit recognition of West Berlin.

Certainly, there are enough people who do not recognise Israel’s existence, and many of them would dearly like to make that a reality. The UN is full of such people, and they will draw strength from Ambassador Erdan’s naïve letter to them. Israel, by her conciliatory fixations, nourishes them. Egregious as this letter might be, however, it does not detract from any of Israel’s more than excellent pre-emptive actions, both within the country and abroad.

If anything, this short essay highlights how counter-productive talking about “the right to defend ourselves” is to the work of taking action to pre-empt attacks, actions that confirm Israel’s strength and control over events, a prerequisite for respect when surrounded by Muslims. Precedents exist. Imagine Saddam Hussein had dropped a nuclear bomb on Tel Aviv and Israel then retaliated by bombing the nuclear facility, claiming the right to defend itself. It is ludicrous. Israel should avoid such enfeebling talk and treat every threat as nuclear, for they all have exactly the same aim. The difference is only that they achieve that aim at different speeds.

For decades Israel’s “political simpletons,” as Ze’ev Jabotinsky called them, have been labouring under the misapprehension that economic prosperity and material comfort will lure their nemesis, Muslim Arabs, into embracing them. The IDF handing over Har haBayït to the vanquished Jordanians after the latter’s aggressive war against Israel in 1967, the catastrophic Oslo Accords that saved the PLO from obliteration, and the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Gaza by none other than the Israeli government itself, stand as damning indictments of that idiotic certainty.

The only certainty here lies with the Muslim Arabs, who see in these otherwise inexplicable Israeli actions clear signs from Allah that they must be patient and will one day be rewarded with the destruction of Israel. Subhanallah. Allahu-akbar! It never seems to cross the minds of those Israelis who complain that they cannot find any Palestinian “partner for peace” that, while Israel has been pleading for peace for seventy-five years, no Palestinian has ever seen that peace-pleader as a partner for peace. There is a reason for that.

In another form, this misapprehension maintains that impeccable moral conduct on Israel’s part will convince the rest of the world that Israel as a force for good. But it is much too late for that. The poison has long ago taken effect. No amount of impeccable moral conduct on Israel’s part now is going to impress anybody who already equates moral conduct with hating Israel and killing Jews, and that’s a lot of people. Ambassador Erdan’s letter of apology, justification, appeasement and pleading is to people uniquely insensitive to Jewish apology, justification, appeasement and pleading. It shows to Israel’s enemies exactly the kind of weakness that confirms them in what they do and encourages them to press on. Victory will be theirs very soon, insha-Allah. And in the meantime, Israelis keep dying.

* News just in suggests that Israel might finally be getting serious about the jihad threat developing in Judea and Samaria. I prefer to reserve judgement, having seen the Jews giving effect to “close settlement of the land” let down too many times. There is also a cynical response, which I shall spare my readers.

Dr Anjuli Pandavar

18 August 2023

Picture credits:

Egyptian watchtower at Gaza Rafah border, Marius Arnesen - Flickr: Watch Tower, Rafa, Gaza/Egypt, CC BY-SA 3.0 no,

Spent rocket casings, Sderot, Marek Peters / www.marek-peters.comAdditionally you can support Marek Peters by Flattr. - self-made (, GFDL 1.2,

A kindergarten in central Israel during a rocket alarm, Israel Defense Forces from Israel - Operation Protective Edge, CC BY 2.0,

United Nations Security Council, White House (Pete Souza) / Maison Blanche (Pete Souza) - The Official White House Photostream [1], Public Domain,

Iron Dome battery, IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, CC BY-SA 3.0,

13 views0 comments


פוסטים אחרונים

bottom of page